The recent plagiarism investigation involving Harvard President Claudine Gay presents an opportunity to reassess our understanding of plagiarism. This reevaluation becomes particularly pertinent in an era increasingly dominated by AI-driven writing, coupled with a not-so-distant past in which plagiarism was treated less stringent. The Harvard case serves as a microcosm of a broader discussion about the evolving nature of intellectual creation and ownership in the modern world.
Read Full Article »
